Peer review

Peer review is when research is checked by other experts before publication. It helps catch errors and improve quality.

Definition

Peer review is a standard quality check in academic publishing. It is not perfect, but it adds scrutiny to research methods and conclusions. Good evidence usually comes from multiple studies, not one paper. NeuroBreath references sources so you can read more.

Why it matters here

We use peer‑reviewed sources to support educational content.

In NeuroBreath you can use this term for…

Common misunderstandings

  • Peer review guarantees results.
  • All peer‑reviewed studies are equally strong.

Related terms

Citations & review

Educational only. External links are provided as copy‑only references.

Citations

Sources are copy‑only for transparency — external links are not clickable.

  • COPE

    https://publicationethics.org/

  • UK Research Integrity Office

    https://ukrio.org/

Written by:NeuroBreath Editorial Team·Editorial team
Reviewed by:Evidence Review Desk·Evidence reviewer
Editorial roles: Author drafts content · Reviewer checks clarity and safety language · Evidence reviewer checks source quality · Accessibility reviewer checks readability. Meet the editorial team.

Last reviewed

17 Jan 2026

Next review due

16 Jul 2026

Updated

17 Jan 2026

Evidence & sources

3 sources · tiers A, B

Update history
  • 17 Jan 2026contentInitial glossary definition published.

Educational information only — not medical advice. Read the disclaimer.

Peer review — Glossary | NeuroBreath | NeuroBreath